FREE CASE EVALUATION | 1-800-375-7939

What Are The Factors Influencing The Amount of Compensation I Can Get For My Bone Injuries? June 10, 2019

While each personal injury case is, of course, unique when it comes to the surrounding circumstances, there will always be some common rules and guidelines at which you can orientate yourself when it comes to estimating the value of a personal injury case. Below, we will discuss and explain some common factors which are known to influence the outcome of a personal injury case involving broken and fractured bones.

The amount of medical evidence which can be provided

The severity and nature of an injury can be best proven by providing evidence in the form of x-rays. These are commonly used as evidence since they are usually an automatic result of a bone injury when it has been diagnosed and treated at a hospital. Compared to soft tissue injuries, hard injuries, such as broken and fractured bones are much more easily proven. Your personal injury lawyer in Red Deer works with a plethora of doctors and experts to ensure all medical records are submitted as required.

Finding common ground with the defendant and making compromises

The general consensus is that nobody wants to take a personal injury case to trial. This is because of the high litigation costs, the fees, and huge time investment that comes along with an in-court settlement. Furthermore, settlements decided by the judge or jury are oftentimes less satisfying for everyone involved which makes them unfavorable for all parties. That is why having the professional services of an expert lawyer can help your case.

However, that doesn’t mean that pretrial negotiations are quick and easy. Each side will have their own expectations, wants, and needs, and finding common ground can take a lot of compromise on both ends. Once both sides have gotten an idea of what the other side is willing to compromise on, and how much value they have calculated a case to have, negotiations can properly begin and expectations can be properly set.

How liability will influence the outcome

If the plaintiff does not have a lot of evidence that they can pit against the defendant, chances are that the settlement will be on the low end of the spectrum. After all, if the case were to make it to trial, the defendant knows that they are unlikely to be blindsided with a high settlement to pay. Similarly, a plaintiff in this situation is also more likely to accept a low settlement since they will know that they may run risk of getting nothing at all should the case end up being taken to trial. It is here the experience of the lawyer counts.